Your Browser is not support JavaScript, some wrongs will appear maybe.
banner image Banner Flash
| Home | About Us | Activites and Projects | Geology of Taiwan | SiteMap | MOEA | change to Chinese Page |
title image
:::
Introduction
Earlier Geologic Maps of Taiwan
Geographic Setting
General Geology And Geologic Provinces Of Taiwan
Explanation Of Legend And Representation Of Geologic Data
Eastern Central Range
Western Central Range Backbone Ridges
Western Foothills
Eastern Coastal Range
Geology Of The Hengchun Peninsula
Major Geologic Features Of Taiwan
Plate Tectonic Setting
References


:::Western Central Range Backbone Ridges
General Geologic Features General Stratigraphy Stratigraphy of The Northern Part of The Hsuehshan Range Belt Stratigraphy of The Central and Southern Parts of The Hsuehshan Range Belt Stratigraphy of The Backbone Range Belt Geologic Structure and Metamorphism Geologic History
Stratigraphy of The Northern Part of The Hsuehshan Range Belt

HSITSUM FORMATION

This is the oldest stratigraphic unit exposed in the Hsuehshan Range belt. The name, Hsitsun Formation, was first used by Ooe (1931) to represent the lower member of the Wulai Series in northern Taiwan. This formation is composed of well-foliated dark gray slate and phyllitic slate. Interbeds of dark colored, fine-grained, hard quartzose sandstone are more abundant in the lower part of the formation. The present outcrops of the Hsitsun Formation are restricted to a narrow belt extending along the axis of an anticline from the type locality Hsitsun on the border of Taichung-hsien and Ilan-hsien to the village near Yuanshan on the Ilan plain. The lower part of the Hsitsun Formation was named the Chungling (Churei) Formation in some early reports, but this subdivision is entirety unwarranted in small-scale maps. The exposed part of the Hsitsun Formation in the anticlinal axis at the type locality may attain 600 meters in thickness, but the lower part of the formation is not exposed. The age of the Hsitsun Formation has not been determined paleontologically because no diagnostic fossil has ever been found in the rocks. The Hsitsun Formation is referred to as Oligocene to Eocene because it conformably underlies the Szeleng Sandstone whose age is inferred to be Oligocene. The exact age of the Hsitsun Formation must be verified by further paleontologic studies and/or other means. The Hsitsun Formation is lithologically and stratigraphically correlated to the Chiayang Formation exposed in the central part of the Hsuehshan Range belt.

SZELENG SANDSTONE

The Szeleng Sandstone is an important lithologic marker that is used to subdivide the immense argillite-slate sequence of the Hsuehshan Range belt into a number of mappable units. The name was first applied by Ooe (1931) to a thick quartzitic sandstone formation in the Wulai Series of northern Taiwan; the type locality Szeleng is on the north cross-island highway in Ilan-hsien. This formation is characterized by thick-bedded, light gray to whitish gray, quartzitic sandstone or quartzite intercalated with dark gray argillite or slate. The sandstone is dark where it is in association with carbonaceous shale. The carbonaceous shale often grades into coaly or graphitic lenses laterally, but both the coal and the graphite are contaminated by clayey impurities and are of no mining value. The sandstone is medium- to coarse-grained and grades into conglomeratic sandstone locally. It is generally arkosic to subarkosic. Cross-bedding and ripple marks are common in the sandstone. The type locality Szeleng structurally lies in a northeast-trending anticline. On the southeast flank of the anticline, the Szeleng Sandstone is about 350 meters thick and is composed dominantly of whitish quartzitic sandstone. The Szeleng Sandstone on the northwest flank of the anticline is separated into two sandstone members by an intervening argillite-slate member that is approximately 100 meters thick. The total thickness of the Szeleng Sandstone on this flank reaches 700 meters or so.
The Szeleng Sandstone is widely exposed in northern and northeastern Taiwan. The northernmost distribution of this unit is in the upper drainage areas of the Tahanchi, the Peishihchi and the Nanshihchi, mainly as small exposures. It is well exposed on the eastern part of the Taipei-Ilan highway and the north cross-island highway. Scattered outcrops of the Szeleng Sandstone are distributed near Toucheng, Chiaochi, and Yuanahan on the western hillside of the Ilan plain in northeastern Taiwan. Southward to central Taiwan, the Szeleng Sandstone is replaced by the Paileng (Hakurei) Formation and these two formations may be correlative units. The Szeleng Sandstone is replaced by the Meichi Sandstone in the eastern part of the Hsuehshan Range belt. All these units will be discussed later in this chapter. The quartzitic sandstone of the Szeleng Sandstone is usually devoid of identifiable fossil remains. Only the slaty shale intercalated in the sandstone yields some molluscan and foraminiferal faunas, and these are not age-diagnostic. Other fossils reported to have been found in the Szeleng Sandstone are suspect and age of the Szeleng Sandstone remains to be verified by future studies. At present the Szeleng Sandstone is tentatively ascribed to early Oligocene on the basis of inferred stratigraphic sequence.
The Szeleng Sandstone is a carbonaceons unit in the Hsuehshan Range belt. This coaly and carbonaceons member is developed only in the western part of the Hsuehshan Range, indicating closeness to shore toward the west. Cross-stratification in the sandstone also shows a paleocurrent coming mainly from the west. All the combined lithologic characters and sedimentary features indicate that this formation was deposited in a near-shore deltaic to shallow neritic environment, and the sediment was derived mainly from mainland China to the west.

KANKOU FORMATION

All the metamorphosed argillaceous sediments overlying the Szeleng Sandstone in the Hsuehshan Range belt are classified into two formations in the map legend: the Kankou Formation and the overlying Tatungshan Formation. Both are old formational names of the Wulai Series proposed by Ichikawa (1930 and 1932). The Shuichangliu Formation in central Taiwan is considered to be the equivalent of these two formations. The demarcation between the Kankou Formation and the Tatungshan Formation is arbitrary and subjective.
The Kankou Formation is composed predominantly of black to dark gray shaly sediments which have been either indurated into argillite or metamorphosed into slate or phyllitic slate. The argillite and slate are compact, often forming precipitous walls showing distinct pencil structure or woody fracture surfaces. Sandy interbeds are rare to very rare in the Kankou Formation. Distinction between the Kankou Formation and the overlying Tatungshan Formation is made on the abundance of sandstone or siltstone interbeds. The Kankou Formation grades upward into the Tatungshan Formation, in which more sandy or silty interbeds appear in the argillaceous sequence. No clear-cut boundary between these two units can be clearly defined in areas lacking the locally intervening Tsuku Sandstone member. Because the occurrence of sandy interbeds varies in different places, the thickness of the Kankou Formation also varies greatly in different sections, ranging from 600 to 1,200 meters. Slaty cleavage is well-developed in the southeastern part of the outcrop area, and generally cuts bedding at an angle. The faunas and geologic age of the Kankou Formation are the same as the Tatungshan Formation and are discussed below. Foraminifers and calcareous nannofossils are the main organic remains in both formations. The Hsuanyuan (Kayahara) Shale of some old Japanese reports (Ooe, 1931) is correlated to the Kankou Formation and is composed mostly of slaty shale.

TATUNGSHAN FORMATION

The Tatungshan Formation is widely distributed in the Hsuehshan Range belt and is exposed in all the leading fold structures from the northern coast southward to central Taiwan. The lower part of this formation is composed of dark gray to black argillite closely interbedded with gray fine-grained sandstone and muddy siltstone. Contacts between the argillite and sandstone or muddy siltstone are rather irregular. The two are often gradational into each other in beds of 10 centimeters to two meters thick. The muddy siltstone is compact and resistant to weathering, often forming sharp bluffs along river beds resembling sandstone scarps. This is the most striking feature of this formation. The upper part of the Tatungshan Formation is represented largely by dark, compact argillite and sandy shale with fewer interbeds of sandstone or muddy siltstone. The argillaceous beds are commonly massive when wet but show good fissility and cleavage surface on drying. Bedding is distinct in some places and indistinct in some other places, but spaced and slaty cleavage are relatively well developed. The reported thickness of the Tatungshan Formation varies from 800 meters to 2,000 meters and more in different papers as the type section of the formation has not been accurately measured. Different workers may have had different ideas in defining the upper and lower limit of the formation. However, reasonable estimates indicate that the total thickness of the Tatungshan Formation is on the order of 1,500 meters or more.
In the northern part of the Hsuehshan Range belt, thick sandstone beds are more abundant in the lower part of the Tatungshan Formation. The sandstone is dark gray, muddy, and fine-grained, with thin interbeds of argillite. Some geologists are inclined to call it siltstone rather than sandstone. This sandstone member reaches a, total thickness of 200'meters or more and was formerly named the Tsuku Sandstone Formation by Ichikawa (1932). It serves as a well-defined marker to separate the Tatungshan Formation from the Kankou Formation below. The Tsuku Sandstone represents only the sandstone-rich part of the lower Tatungshan Formation and is restricted to the northern part of the outcropping area. Southward from the Wulai area in northern Taiwan, the thick sandstone member gradually thins out and the Tatungshan Formation is composed mainly of argillite with muddy sandstone interbeds. Further southward to central Taiwan, the muddy sandstone interbeds in the Tatungshan Formation gradually diminish and the formation is composed largely of black to dark gray argillite and slate with minor sandy interbeds. This is where distinction between the Tatungshan Formation and the Kankou Formation becomes increasingly difficult, and the Shuichangliu Formation has been proposed in central Taiwan to include these two formations.
Small lenticular to irregular bodies of basaltic rocks and a few lava flows are disseminated at many places in the Tatungshan Formation. Some volcanic lenses occur also in the Kankou Formation but are much less abundant. The volcanic rocks are more common in northern Taiwan than in central Taiwan. The volcanic rocks vary in thickness from less than one meter to several tens of meters. They are usually interbedded at different stratigraphic levels in the argillite and slate, in general conformity with the foliation of the enclosing sediments although discordant sheets may also occur. Horizontal extension or length of the volcanic bodies is uncertain because it is difficult to trace them laterally due to rugged terrain and heavy vegetation cover. The actual distribution of the volcanic bodies is probably much more extensive than is shown on the present map. These volcanic effusives are believed to have erupted from various fissures contemporaneous with deposition of the argillaceous sediments of the Tatungshan Formation.
The Tatungshan Formation, the Kankou Formation, and the correlative Shuichangliu Formation contain a rich assemblage of faunas, including mollusks, foraminifers, and echinoids. For some time these three formations have been considered Oligocene based on the foraminiferal fauna in the Tatungshan Formation exposed in Yushan, which is about 30 kilometers northeast of the type locality Tatungshan. The Yushan faunule represents the Oligocene Shihtsaoan stage proposed by L.S. Chang (1954). The Oligocene age has also been supported by the study of nannofossils contained in this formation.

AOTI FORMATION

In the old Japanese literature, two rock units were proposed for the clastic sedimentary rocks conformably overlying the Tatungshan Formation in the Wulai Series: the Kueishan (Kizan) Formation and the Chuchih (Kussyaku) Formation. These two formation names have lost status among geologists because their definitions are ambiguous and often lead to misleading stratigraphic interpretations. A new stratigraphic term, Aoti Formation, was proposed as the uppermost unit of the Wulai Series that constitutes the argillite-slate sequence of the Hsuehshan Range belt. The Aoti Formation was named by Yen and Chen (1953) after a fishing village on the northeastern coast of Taiwan. Unfortunately this stratigraphic term is a misnomer as the strata exposed at the type locality are mainly the Wentzekeng Formation which is correlated to the Wuchihshan Formation or the Tatungshan Formation. For this reason some geologists have suggested replacing the Aoti Formation with a new name, Fulung Formation, because a good section of the Aoti Formation is exposed near Fulung southeast of the village of Aoti. However, the Aoti Formation has been in general use in the geologic literature for some time and has been accepted by many workers. The name is still retained in the legend to avoid creating new stratigraphic names.
The Aoti Formation conformably overlies the Tatungshan Formation but is not composed of the characteristic sequence of argillite or slate in the Hsuehshan Range belt. It is a carbonaceous or coal-bearing unit similar to the Szeleng Sandstone, but the rocks are only slightly indurated and are thus considerably less metamorphosed than all the underlying formations of the Wulai Series. The distribution of the Aoti Formation is restricted to the northeastern part of the Hsuehshan Range belt; no Aoti Formation is exposed to the southwest of the Touchienchi stream in Hsinchu-hsien. The two major outcrop areas of the Aoti Formation are both northeasterly-trending synclinal belts. The first belt begins from Fulung on the coast and extends southward through Pinglin to Ayushan for a length of 55 kilometers and a width of 5 kilometers. The second belt is located in the upper tributaries of the Tahanchi stream near Kaokang, Paling, and Hsiuluan. It is approximately 40 kilometers long and dissected by a dextral fault in the middle. Lesser exposures of the Aoti Formation are found in a number of strips between Hsintien and Wulai and southwest of Tingshuangchi in Taipei-hsien.
In field mapping, the Aoti Formation is divided into the lower Makang member and the upper Fangchiao member. The Makang member is about 370 meters thick and is composed of thin, alternating beds of gray, fine-grained sandstone and dark gray shale. These clastic rocks are slightly indurated and weakly compacted, showing a faint foliated texture. The sandstone is partly micaceous and contains sand pipes and ripple marks. In places it is ferruginous with nodular clay-ironstone concretions. The alternating beds range in thickness from several centimeters to several meters, although some thick sandstone beds attain a thickness of more than 10 meters. The exposed Fangchiao member in the type locality is about 350 meters thick and is the coal-bearing member of the Aoti Formation. It consists mainly of thick-bedded, medium-to fine-grained sandstone interbedded with dark gray shale or carbonaceous shale. Thin interlaminations of sandstone-siltstone-shale are also characteristic. The sandstone is grayish white to bluish white, ranging in bed thickness from 20 centimeters to 5 meters and more. It is compact and well-jointed, with an obscure banded texture. The sandstone in the upper part is feldspathic and somewhat kaolinized. Two impure coal beds are found in the upper part of the Fangchiao member, each less .than 20 centimeters thick and generally not workable. From the study of different sections in various places, the maximum thickness of the Aoti Formation may reach nearly 1,200 meters.
When the Aoti Formation was studied in the first synclinal belt at the type locality near Fulung, no positive age indicator was identified among the fossils collected. This formation was assigned to late Oligocene to early Miocene age because it lies conformably on the Oligocene Tatungshan Formation in which the Yuhangian fauna of the Shihtsaoan stage of Chang was discovered. The Aoti Formation was also named the Lowest coal-bearing formation in early stratigraphic study to differentiate it stratigraphically from the Lower coal-bearing formation (Mushan Fromation) in the western foothills. However, recent studies confirm that stratigraphically the Aoti Formation is the equivalent of the Mushan Formation (See Table 3), but these two units are located in differing geologic provinces of Taiwan so they are categorized in two different stratigraphic systems.

SULO FORMATION

This is a new stratigraphic unit proposed for the first time in this revised geologic map of Taiwan. The type locality Sulo is a small village in the upper course of the Tahanchi stream in Taoyuan-hsien. This formation includes all the Miocene rocks conformably overlying the Aoti Formation in the Hsuehshan Range belt of the Central Range. The age of this unit is early to middle Miocene (N5 to N8). The type section is exposed in the second synclinal belt formed of the Aoti Formation mentioned before. The outcropping areas cover the mountain terrain of Sankuang and Hsiuluan in the upper courses of the Tahanchi and the Touchienchi streams.
The discovery of Miocene rocks in the argillite-slate series of the Central Range was first reported by the Japanese geologist Y. Oinouye and his team (1928) during their reconnaissance study of the oil geology in Taiwan. After World War II, Yen and Chiang (1964) studied these rocks again and discovered a belt of Miocene rocks of 40 kilometers long and nearly 6 kilometers wide exposed in the core of an ENE- trending syncline in the Paling-Sulo area along the north cross-island highway in the upper reaches of the Tahanchi in Taoyuan-hsien. The underlying formation is the Tatungshan Formation quite typical of the Hsuehshan Range belt. They believed these slightly indurated Miocene rocks are exactly the same as those exposed in the western foothills. They thus mapped them as the Nankang Formation, the Shihti Formation and the Taliao Formation which are common Miocene litho-units in the western foothills. Due to a discrepancy in stratigraphic sequence, they interpreted that these rocks are at a fault contact with the underlying Tatungshan Formation. Subsequent detailed mapping in the area (Tsan, 1976; Tang and Yang, 1976) did not substantiate the fault hypothesis and the Tatungshan Formation is found conformably underlying the Miocene strata without any break. Stratigraphic analysis shows that the only formation that lies conformably on the Tatungshan Formation is the Aoti Formation. Additional lithostratigraphic study proves that the lowest part of the Miocene rocks in the area concerned resembles closely the Aoti Formation in gross features. Thus the Miocene rocks in the study area of Yen and Chiang (1964) can be stratigraphically divided into two units: the Aoti Formation which has already been discussed and the overlying Sulo Formation which is newly proposed in this revised map and text.
Miocene fossils have been discovered in the Sulo Formation. On the basis of Foraminifera, L. S. Chang (1973) stated that these Miocene fossils are correlated to those found in the Miocene Hsichih Group in the western foothills and can be ascribed to N8 zone (partly N7). Later study of the nannofossils by T. C. Huang (1980a) proved that the nannofossils in the Sulo Formation belong to zone NN4 and also to foraminiferal zone N8. The age is considered mainly middle Miocene. As the Aoti Formation in the Hsuehshan Range belt is correlated to the Mushan Formation in the western foothills, the Sulo Formation in the same belt can thus be correlated to the Tailiao Formation, the Shihti Formation and the Nankang Formation in the western foothills. The age of the Sulo Formation is then dated as early to middle Miocene.
In a recent paper dealing with the Sulo Formation by Tu and others (1987), the total thickness of the Sulo Formation at the type locality is estimated to be a little more than 1,000 meters. The underlying strata are represented by the Aoti Formation and then the Tatungshan Formation. The former is generally barren of fossils. The basal part of the Sulo Formation is composed of gray argillite or slate about 250 meters thick. Thin, gray, fine-grained sandstone is locally intercalated in the argillite. The lower part of the Sulo Formation consists of thick, gray to light gray, fine-to medium-grained sandstone about 120 meters thick. On top of this thick sandstone is a member of alternating sandstone and shale about 100 meters thick. Scattered coaly fragments have been found in the shaly rocks. A thick and massive sandstone member of 200 meters thick lies on top of the alternating beds. The sandstone is gray to bluish gray, fine-to medium-grained, and partly muddy. Overlying the sandstone is a shale member 120 meters thick. Organic remains are rather abundant in the shale, which seems to be scarcely metamorphosed. A thick unit of bluish gray calcareous sandstone about 200 meters thick overlies the shale member. Cross-bedding, ripple marks, and trace fossils and other sedimentary structures are distinct in the sandstone, which forms the uppermost exposed part of the Sulo Formation.
The Hsichih Group in the western foothills, the Sulo Formation in the Hsuehshan Range belt, and the Lushan Formation in the Backbone Range belt are chronologically correlative units because they all contain the same early to middle Miocene fossils. However, these three units are stratigraphically located in three different geologic provinces. They differ in lithologic section, in stratigraphic sequence, and in depositional environment; thus these three units differ lithostratigraphically. This is the main reason to propose a new stratigraphic name, the Sulo Formation, for the Miocene rocks exposed in the Hsuehshan Range belt as discussed in this section.

:::© CENTRAL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, MOEA P.O.BOX 968, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
2, Lane 109, Hua-Hsin Street, Chung-Ho, Taipei, Taiwan 235, Republic of China
TEL: +886-2-29462793FAX: +886-2-29429291 E-mail:cgs@moeacgs.gov.tw
The best browsing mode is 1024*768
Site visited : 0003149776 Last maintained : 2010-09-03